Uber’s Fatal Crash Raises Big Questions About Self-Driving Cars
Released on 03/20/2018
[Narrator] A woman has died after being hit
by a self-driving Uber vehicle in Tempe, Arizona.
And while this is believed to be the first time
an autonomous vehicle has killed somebody,
chances are it won't be the last.
While crashes are inevitable,
it underscores just how new this technology is
and how little society at large has done
to prepare for the onset of self-driving robotic vehicles.
Those who are already concerned about automated driving
will be much more concerned.
Those who are enthusiastic
will, I think, ascribe this to a failure,
but put it in the context of the tragedies
that we have every day on the road.
[Narrator] In a country where human drivers
kill 40,000 people every year,
a solution that does away with distraction, drinking,
and sleeping behind the wheel sounds like a great idea.
And for the companies working to build the things,
there are trillions of dollars to be made.
It's all coming soon, too.
Waymo has taken the human backup out of its cars
and wants to start commercial service in a few months.
Uber is sending robo-trucks hundreds of miles
and figuring out how to make them work
at the logistical level.
In the US, every state makes its own rules
about where the robots can drive
and what sort of information their creators have to share
with the government and the public.
Arizona's rules are especially lax,
which is one reason why Uber tests there
and Waymo wants to launch
its ride-hailing service in the state.
But now that somebody has been killed, attitudes may change.
And questions that some people have been asking quietly
will start to echo.
First, just how safe are these cars
and do they belong on public roads
before they're fully ready?
So far, no one even has a clear idea
of what ready actually means.
Second, is the human backup enough to keep everyone safe
when the car makes a mistake?
Third, should governments have more control
over how this technology works
and would they have the right expertise
to make thoughtful regulations?
Each side is really going to see in this what they want,
at least at this early stage.
My hope, my expectation, is that the serious actors
in this field, the developers, regulators,
their primary interest is in figuring out what happened
and how this can be prevented in the future.
[Narrator] And with technology that can save lives
or take them, many people want a better
or at least clearer way forward.
In other words, maybe it's time to tap the brakes.
Demis Hassabis On The Future of Work in the Age of AI
Simon Pegg Answers The Web's Most Searched Questions
Ana de Armas & Ian McShane Answer The Web's Most Searched Questions
Entomologist Answers Insect Questions
Every Cyber Attack Facing America
Jackie Chan Answers The Web's Most Searched Questions
ENHYPEN Answer The Web's Most Searched Questions
Farmer Answers Farming Questions
How Smart Devices Spy On Your Home—And How To Avoid It
Cybersecurity Expert Answers Hacking History Questions