This article was taken from the August 2012 issue of Wired magazine. Be the first to read Wired's articles in print before they're posted online, and get your hands on loads of additional content by subscribing online.
For the past four years, Brooklyn web designer Mark Suppes has been building a nuclear-fusion reactor in the corner of a friend's cluttered warehouse -- even though he has no background in nuclear physics, has never even studied electrical engineering and has a full-time website job at The New York Times.
Suppes, 34, was inspired by a video made by Robert Bussard, one of fusion's pioneers, on the technology's potential to solve the world's energy problems. "I couldn't think of a better project to get involved in," he says.
Suppes's reactor -- which incorporates parts sourced on eBay -- is about the size of a filing cabinet and looks like something out of Back to the Future: "The whole thing is really cool, ancient technology," he says. "Pipes and pumps and tubes. I am using an electron gun from an old cathode-ray tube from the 50s."
At its centre is a core of deuterium atoms that, when heated to 100 million degrees Celsius, should fuse into helium and release a huge amount of safe, clean energy. The challenge, though, is how to achieve such a high temperature (about six times hotter than the Sun's core) without using more energy than is created. He isn't alone in trying to solve the problem. The US Navy is tackling the issue at a base in California, an international project is under way in southern France, and Iran is rumoured to be working on a reactor; but, as far as he knows, Suppes's is the only small-scale project and the only one to use superconducting magnets -- the key, he says, to making the reactor efficient.
Suppes is getting advice and support from the open-source community. So far he has spent about $50,000 (£30,000) of his own money plus about $3,000 (£1,943) raised via Kickstarter. "Bussard estimated that a working reactor would generate revenue of about $100 billion a year," he says. "There is plenty of small-scale research still to be done but to fully validate this technology would ultimately require about another $200 million, which so far has proved more than most investors can swallow."
This article was originally published by WIRED UK
