Two prominent human rights groups today blasted America's drone wars in Pakistan and Yemen, painting a grim picture of massive civilian deaths and potentially grave violations of international law.
One report by Amnesty International ("Will I Be Next?") focuses on recent drone strikes in Pakistan while the other, by Human Rights Watch ("Between a Drone and al-Qaeda"), centers on Yemen.
According to Amnesty International, at least one attack "violated the prohibition of the arbitrary deprivation of life and may constitute war crimes or extrajudicial execution" and said that those responsible should stand trial.
The White House rejected the claims of the reports and denied any wrongdoing in the administration's drone program.
"U.S. counterterrorism operations are precise, they are lawful and they are effective," said White House spokesman Jay Carney in a press conference.
The Obama administration has been better at distancing itself from drone strikes than providing the legal and policy justification for the program.
"Realistically, the policy window for reforming how the U.S. conducts lethal counterterrorism strikes is closed in Washington," says Council on Foreign Relations fellow Micah Zenko, the author of Between Threats and War: U.S. Discrete Military Operations in the Post-Cold War World.
One of the more disturbing case studies in the Amnesty International report is of Mamana Bibi, a 68-year-old grandmother killed as she tended her crops in Ghundi Kala, North Waziristan, Oct. 24, 2012:
Follow-up strikes injured her grandson as he rushed to respond to the first blast.
As is the case with the overwhelming majority of investigations into drone strikes, Amnesty International said their study was limited by a lack of transparency from the administration, something that has also frustrated Congress.
Earlier this year, when the Obama administration declined to send a representative to a Senate hearing on drone operations, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said that "more transparency is needed to maintain the support of the American people and the international community." He added that the White House should provide details on its claim to "its legal authority to engage in targeted killings and the internal checks and balances involved in U.S. drone strikes."