All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links.
Understanding cooperation — under what conditions it occurs, how we can incentivize more of it, and so forth — is important business. I have explored this in myown research, in collaboration with my colleague Dave Rand and others, using the public goods game on social networks.
Well, Dave Rand has done it again. And in addition to doing some amazing research that just got written up in Nature, he has given his paper a super-snappy title: spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Rand, along with Joshua Greene and Martin Nowak, has conducted experiments using the public goods game to understand whether or not the timing of our decisions affect how we act. Specifically, they examined whether or not our speed in responding affects how cooperative we are.
And they found something interesting. They found that the more quickly the subjects responded, the more cooperative and more giving they were. Essentially, as Dave noted to me, "cooperation in public goods games is intuitive, while reflection and deliberation lead to selfishness." In order to ensure the robustness of this result, numerous conditions were examined, such as forcing subjects to respond quickly as well as priming them to encourage reflection. And it seemed to hold up. Below is a graph displaying some of the results:
As the authors conclude (with my added emphasis):
Top image:David Baron/Flickr/CC