My husband has been lucky since acquiring his iPhone. He was looking for a book to read to test out the reader function, saw a commercial for *A Game of Thrones
, *decided to read the book and it was being given away as a free ebook that month in preparation for the show. After that, several people recommended that he read The Pillars of the Earth
, lo and behold, a quick Google search and it too was a free ebook that month from a national retailer. Then it got trickier.
After deciding to read *The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever
*following the directions for picking a Sci/Fi Fantasy book,he could not find a copy anywhere. He was now hooked on finding them for free. He found a hard copy at a library of which he is a member, he also found it illegally as an ebook. Surmising that since a library book was reading it for free, and he wanted to read it on the iPhone, downloading it made it just like reading the copy at his local library. He lasted about an hour with that logic, before deleting the file and becoming grumpy, in a holier than thou kind of way. My husband is a very honest man, it's been two weeks and he still hasn't bought or read the book. With Amazon's addition of the Kindle Lending Library last week, the dilemmas facing my husband seem to be the wave of the future. A few overdue fines at the library pale in comparison with the fact that e-readers may be taking literature the way of Napster and iTunes, as far as morality and public ownership go. As the music industry continues to debate its own standards of ownership, I wonder where e-readers are taking us, and if recent court rulings will have any affect on how we view books that are still covered by their copyright. If I lose my hard copy of a book, am I entitled to an e-copy for free?
Behind the scenes at GeekMom the Kindle Lending Library raised some minor discussion. I am hesitant to accept anything for free from a company that possesses my credit card information, but I am quite happy with a world that accommodates both my love of paper, and my husband's love of the convenience of his e-reader. Otherwise we have a split between those of us happy to forgo paper for .doc, and those who relish wandering around the local library. Would this new policy have any effect on libraries or e-readership figures since it is limited to one book a month? With thegrassroots library movement, that GeekMom Melissa talked about this week, I have great hope in the future of the library.
So my question is, am I reading too much into my husband's one-time moral dilemma, or should author's fear for the sanctity of their work?
