I've just been forwarded an email that was originally sent to the National Society of Genetic Counsellors email list on behalf of a reporter with the Washington Post:
(My emphasis in bold.)
The bolded section gives you a hint of the angle that Stein might be interested in taking with this piece - I'm hopeful this won't be yet another all-out attack piece on personal genomics, but it looks like it may focus on the negatives. (For the record, Stein contacted me by email late last week to ask for my views on FDA regulation of the industry, but we didn't discuss the overall focus of his article.)I think it's important to ensure that Stein has a balanced view of the experiences of people with personal genomics - so i__f you have a positive story about your own experience with the industry, or feel strongly about your right to direct access to your own genome, feel free to pass your views on to the email address above__.