Future Combat Systems -- the Army's long-troubled, mega-expensive reboot -- is already in deep trouble. The last thing it needed was a scathing new review from Congress' investigative arm.
But according to InsideDefense.com, that's exactly what's about to happen. The Government Accountability Office has prepared a "highly critical report" that "questions the fundamentals of the program, from its maturity level to its budget."
The, um, future, of the Army's gazillion dollar project to make the force lighter, more lethal, and better-networked is already in question. Not only has the program been rejiggered, over and over again. But the climate for these kind of high-tech projects has suddenly grown cold. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has noted that "the spigot of defense funding opened by 9/11 is closing," he said. Programs like Future Combat Systems, which focus on tomorrow's "conventional and strategic conflicts" over today's small-and-dirty wars, are the most likely to get caught as that spigot closes.
To stave off "drastic measures by senior Pentagon officials or lawmakers," Defense News recently reported, the Army is looking "kill[ing] or delay[ing]," half of the new tanks, cannon, and personnel carriers at the heart of FCS. But those cuts may not be enough.
The report is set to be released next week. Next comes a pair of
Congressional hearings on FCS. The House Armed Services Committee meets on March 17th. Two weeks later, the House Appropriations defense subcommittee will examine FCS' fate.
ALSO:
- Army Pitches 'Future' Killers as Job-Savers
- Good News for Army's Troubled 'Future'
- Army: No Sats, No Problem for 'Future Combat'
- Pentagon Budget War About to Go From Cold to Hot?
- Army Launching 'Future Combat' P.R. Blitz
- Army's $200 Billion Reboot Fizzles; Murtha Wants $20 Billion More ...
- Army "Future" Pricier, Lamer by the Second
- Boeing Defends Big Price Tag for Army "Future"
- Army's Drones of the 'Future' Head to Iraq, Now
- Army's Familiar 'Future'