A Jerusalem Post opinion piece that attempts to rebut a series of stories on "terror tourism," has at least one major problem: one of the rotating advertisements next to the piece, is, in fact, for a terrorism tour of Israel. Oops.
Calev Ben-David says the series I co-wrote in Slate rests on the "bogus premise" that Israel would encourage such tours (again, I was somewhat distracted by that large, banner advertisement for the "ultimate tour of Israel," but oh well). He writes:
Actually, I'm not sure Ben-David read the full series, since we point out that the undeniable goal of our tour was to market Israeli technology and techniques to U.S. law enforcement. And identical tours -- particularly the one advertised on the Jerusalem Post's website --* are* meant for the casual tourist. I also think Ben-David is missing a more subtle point of the articles, which is not to approve or condemn such trips or even to suggest they were attracting thousands to Israel. Rather we wanted to point out how such tours are the continuation of long-standing efforts to use tourism and professional tours as a way to convince travelers of Israel's precarious security situation.