If you want to break into a house, then the smart approach is not to shoulder-charge the thickest wall. It's much easier to kick down the door. The same goes for attacking bunkers: taking a sledgehammer approach to smashing through to them is not as smart as going through the main entrance. My article in this month's *Defense Technology International *describes the Air Force's new tools for "kicking down the door" and attacking tunnel entrances.
The big challenge is that the weapon needs to be going horizontally rather than vertically. The answer is a technique that was used in WWII – skip bombing.
The bomb is skimmed across the ground like a stone skipping on water. Although this was most notably done using Barnes Wallis' famous Upkeep "'bouncing bombs" to attack German dams, but a smaller version called Highball was developed to hit ground targets such as tunnels.
The same tactic was adopted by the US aviators in the Pacific using standard bombs:
Using this approach required the hair-raising approach of flying into the teeth of enemy flak at low level, but it certainly proved effective:
In fact the skipping technique goes back much further than WWII -- it was used by Napoleonic artillerymen to increase the lethality of cannonballs, bouncing them into enemy troop formations at head height.
Modern-day skip bombing is going to be carried out at higher speed and from higher altitude than the WWII variety, and this requires a special sort of bomb – the BLU-121/B:
And if one bouncing bomb is not enough to break the door down, my article in DTI goes on to describe another twist: new guidance software whith will allow the Air Force to hit the target with six skipping bombs at the same time: "The desired end result is to cause the multiple warheads to act as one large explosive charge by detonating the independent, closely spaced warheads simultaneously." That should do the trick...
(Photo: iskip)