How many troops do we need in Germany, really? U.S. European Command chief General Bantz J. Craddock's answer: a whole lot. In this Stars and Stripes article, he tries to make the case to slow down the US troop reductions in his theater.
Help me out here. The new Africa Command says it will not be conducting major troop movements in its area of responsibility, so it's not as if European Command troops will be going there. The Cold War is over, and Putin is our bestest bud ever (so I hear from the White
House). There's a ittle issue with Kosovo/Bosnia there, but (as US
officials once believed) that could be handled by the European Union.
I certainly understand the need to keep air bases in Europe and agreements to cooperate in training and operations exercises. But why do we need four brigades in Europe any more? Do we need four combat brigades to have personnel to conduct bilateral/multilateral military agreements? Why not reduce EUCOM's presence to something like Central
Command - forces assigned to the command only when required? We may need a new model here, something that allows for military personnel deployments without all the emphasis on hardware in theater. Let's not just retain brigades in EUCOM just as a way to keep the Army bigger, as a whole.