I hate to say it, but after flipping through the February issue I gotta say I'm disapointed with the new look. The "provacative photography and inventive illustration[s]" though bold, don't relate well to the articles or the flow of the magazine. I find myself just flipping to the next page without even reading the article because the photography is too disturbing (ex. picture accompanying "A Homemade Bomb" pg 134-135). Re-inventing the look of the magazine is a noble goal, but I think you missed the mark.
Kensington HatcherDaleville, VA
